1.KWL Reflection Lesson 3 (5 pts.)
You began this lesson by completing the “K” (what you KNOW about the topic) and the “W” (WHAT you wanted to learn about the topic). Now it is time to complete the most important part of the reflection and identify the “L” (what you have LEARNED).
Pick at least two concepts you LEARNED from this lesson. Explain what you learned about polices, procedures, and emergency preparedness to keep children safe, why the ideas are important, and how you will implement them into your teaching practice. Your response should be between 200-250 words in length.
Submit your KWL Reflection using the following link: KWL Reflection Lesson 3(opens in a new tab). Â
Review Submitting Assignments(opens in a new tab) if you need help copying and pasting your assignment.
2. Critical Thinking Assignment (10 pts.)
The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate your ability to identify components of accurate recordkeeping, documentation, and describe various formats used for documentation. Knowing how to properly document safety procedures and incidents is important for the early childhood professional. Review the five formats from the lesson:
- Checklists (playground safety, maintenance inspection)
- Information logs (illness, diapering, sign-in/sign-out)
- Permission forms (field trips, transportation, medication administration)
- Fill-in-the-blank documents (enrollment, emergency information card, health assessment)
- Description paragraphs [also known as “charting”] (observations, accidental events)
- as well as explain the principles of safe medication documentation and management.
Contact an early childhood program (e.g., center, family child care home, or school-based program) and choose three different forms to review. Write a critical assessment of each form identifying these three components: the purpose, the strengths, and the areas of improvement for EACH form. EACH of three assessments should be a minimum of 200 words.
Questions to think about while formulating your assessment:
- What is the purpose of the form?
- How does this form keep children safe?
- Does the form answer the Six Essential Documentation Questions(opens in a new tab)? If not, what is missing?
- What would you add or delete from each form?
- Is a signature needed? Why or why not?
Be sure to summarize your responses to all questions thoroughly for each form collected. Use information from the lesson to support your response. Review the Lesson 3Â Critical Thinking rubric(opens in a new tab) to know how your instructor will grade this assignment.
refreceÂ
Read each of the following in Safety, Health, and Nutrition in Early Childhood Education:(opens in a new tab)
- Chapter 5: “Caring for Minor Injuries and Preparing for and Managing Emergencies,” pp. 107-135
- Chapter 6: “Child Maltreatment,” pp. 136-152
1 | H e a l t h , S a f e t y , a n d N u t r i t i o n i n E a r l y C h i l d h o o d E d u c a t i o n
Safety, Health, and Nutrition
in Early Childhood Education
Derivative with state regulations removed
by Sharon Armstrong and Jennifer Paris
Based on California specific version by
Jennifer Paris
2 | H e a l t h , S a f e t y , a n d N u t r i t i o n i n E a r l y C h i l d h o o d E d u c a t i o n
Safety, Health, and Nutrition in Early Childhood
Education
Created by Sharon Armstrong and Jennifer Paris
Except where otherwise noted, the content in this book is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2021
This book is a derivative of the original Open Educational
Resources Publication by College of the Canyons (Version 1.0)
Created by Jennifer Paris
Peer Reviewed by Rebecca Laff
Edited by Lauren Adams, Alex Gavilan, Alexa Johnson, and Trudi Radtke
Cover Image: “Image”, CDC is in the Public Domain
Except where otherwise noted, the content in the original book is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
3 | H e a l t h , S a f e t y , a n d N u t r i t i o n i n E a r l y C h i l d h o o d E d u c a t i o n
Changes Made in this Derivative
The original version of the textbo
EED215 V6
Lesson 3 Critical Assignment Rubric (25 points)
Criteria Emerging
(3 point each)
Proficient
(4 points each)
Accomplished
(5 points each)
Critcal Assessment
Form #1
The response addressed one of the three
required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
The response addressed two of
the three required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
The response addressed three of
the three required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
Critical
Assessment of
Form #2
The response addressed one of the three
required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
The response addressed two of
the three required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
The response addressed thre of the
three required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
Critical
Assessment of
Form #3
The response addressed one of the three
required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
The response addressed two of
the three required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
The response addressed three of
the three required components:
1. Purpose
2. Strengths
3. Areas for improvement
Analysis and
Evaluation
There is no evidence of the student’s
analysis or evaluation of the
assignment.
The student identifies some
conclusions, sees some
arguments, identifies some
differences, paraphrases
data, and assumes that
information is valid.
The student examines
conclusions, uses reasonable
judgment, discriminates
rationally, views information
critically, and synthesizes
data/information.
Writing Writing does not provide a coherent
purpose and has many errors in
mechanics, grammar, syntax, or
spelling.
Writing identifies a purpose
and has few errors in
mechanics, grammar, syntax,
or spelling.
Writing identifies a strong
purpose and has no errors in
mechanics, grammar, syntax, or
spelling.
Total Possible
Points
Emerging
(15 points)
Proficient
(20 points)
Accomplished
( 25 points)